Indian Premier League :: IPL Cricket Forum

[cricket1990]

ACCORDING TO ME 2020 IS MORE BETTER BCOZ IT TAKES LESS TIME AND GIVES MORE ENTERTAINMENT

[varungupta]

Well its unfair to compare any two formats of cricket, be it Tests, 50-50 or 20-20!!!!
The game of cricket is big enough to accomodate all the 3 formats!!!
& both 20-20 & 50-50 have their own advantages & limitations.
20-20 is a short , sudden type of a game whereas 50-50 require more skills & planning
by thw way true cricket fans never think abt the format, they just love cricket

[vishal_10dulkar]

depends ..2020 is gud for entertainment but it dsnt actually test d patience n depth of the team.
n its gud for audience <a nightmare for the bowlers>
whereas 5050 chks both ur class as well as ur hitting ability in the slog overs..
so in my point of view 5050

[vijuoberoi]

All fomats of cricket not compared. All formats gives a lot of entertainment. Changings are good but not compared with each other.

[cool.aquarian]

With so many 20-20 matches, many more teams will be getting all out within 20 overs.
20-20 really makes players impatient.
But 50 overs game is also enjoyable when you have lots of time at hands.







`

[kasana_ajay]

It is really difficult to compare any formats of this game. All have their advantages.
T20 tests you both physically and mentally. It tests you in all departments of your game be it fielding, batting or bowling. It gives no real chance of comeback (except in few cases).
50-50 too test you but gives you chance of comeback if your plan doesn't go accordingly. It requires your presence for 100 overs in the game while T20 requires your presence only 40% of that of ODI's
So it will not be good to compare the formats

[ramesh]

best format is t-20

[ramesh]

best format is t-20

[payaloberoi]

T 20 is good format because more attack in less time. Quick results and fast scoring game in short time and more entertainment.